Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRENTWOOD BEHAVIORAL-SHREVEPORT 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRENTWOOD BEHAVIORAL-SHREVEPORT
CCN 194020 | LA | 238 beds | Current EBITDA $4.9M → Pro Forma $8.0M (+$3.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$58.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$3.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$923K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$706K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$37K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$32K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$178K$528K$706K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$37K$37K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$290K$580K$870K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$287K$574K$862K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$235K$471K$706K$706K$706K$706K$706K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K
Cumulative$0$831K$1.7M$2.5M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
9.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x
10.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
11.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.9M$4.9M8.5%
Year 1$5.1M+$2.0M$7.1M12.2%
Year 2$5.2M+$3.1M$8.3M14.3%
Year 3$5.4M+$3.1M$8.4M14.5%
Year 4$5.5M+$3.1M$8.6M14.8%
Year 5$5.7M+$3.1M$8.8M15.1%
$49.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$96.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.1M
Value Created
$8.8M
Exit EBITDA
$7.8M
Organic Growth
$30.5M
RCM Value Creation
$8.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$580K$870K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$574K$862K$1.1M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$353K$529K$706K$847K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$28K$37K$45K
Total$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.5%-15.3%-6.7%0.1%
P91
Net-to-Gross32.7%18.3%24.7%31.0%
P77
Occupancy77.0%46.0%55.9%72.7%
P86
Rev/Bed$244K$537K$1.1M$1.5M
P11
Exp/Bed$223K$543K$1.3M$1.6M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML