Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CCN 193300 | LA | 189 beds | Current EBITDA $35.0M → Pro Forma $62.5M (+$27.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$523.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$35.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$62.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$27.5M
Modeled Uplift
$20.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.4M (vs $27.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$335K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.5M$10.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.1M$288K$10.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.4M$20.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$335K$335K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$167K$335K$335K$335K$335K$335K$335K
Cumulative$0$7.5M$15.0M$22.3M$27.5M$27.5M$27.5M$27.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 14.9x74% / 15.7x
9.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
10.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
11.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
12.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$35.0M$35.0M6.7%
Year 1$36.0M+$18.4M$54.4M10.4%
Year 2$37.1M+$27.5M$64.6M12.4%
Year 3$38.2M+$27.5M$65.8M12.6%
Year 4$39.4M+$27.5M$66.9M12.8%
Year 5$40.5M+$27.5M$68.1M13.0%
$349.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$748.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$399.1M
Value Created
$68.1M
Exit EBITDA
$55.7M
Organic Growth
$275.3M
RCM Value Creation
$68.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.4M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.6M
Clean Claim Rate$167K$251K$335K$402K
Total$13.8M$20.6M$27.5M$33.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.7%-17.7%-5.9%1.3%
P85
Net-to-Gross31.4%19.1%25.0%32.7%
P71
Occupancy68.4%43.7%57.2%70.7%
P69
Rev/Bed$2.8M$434K$1.0M$1.5M
P98
Exp/Bed$2.6M$467K$1.1M$1.6M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML