Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ACADIANA REHABILITATION 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ACADIANA REHABILITATION
CCN 193096 | LA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-663K → Pro Forma $-212K (+$451K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-663K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$451K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-212K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+535bps
Margin Improvement
$323K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$451K
Modeled Uplift
$291K
Risk-Adjusted
-$160K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$170K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$168K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$102K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$451K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$162K$8K$170K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$168K$168K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$26K$77K$102K$323K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$43K$85K$128K$170K$170K$170K$170K
Cost to Collect$0$42K$84K$126K$168K$168K$168K$168K
A/R Days Reduction$0$34K$68K$102K$102K$102K$102K$102K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$124K$247K$366K$451K$451K$451K$451K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $451K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-663K$-663K-7.9%
Year 1$-683K+$300K$-383K-4.5%
Year 2$-704K+$451K$-253K-3.0%
Year 3$-725K+$451K$-274K-3.3%
Year 4$-746K+$451K$-296K-3.5%
Year 5$-769K+$451K$-318K-3.8%
$-6.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.1M
Value Created
$-318K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.1M
Organic Growth
$4.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-318K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$85K$128K$170K$204K
Cost to Collect$84K$126K$168K$202K
A/R Days Reduction$51K$77K$102K$123K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$225K$338K$451K$541K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 126 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.9%-21.2%-3.8%4.9%
P42
Net-to-Gross39.3%31.5%42.0%56.1%
P44
Occupancy43.5%21.3%46.5%65.1%
P46
Rev/Bed$210K$273K$435K$868K
P12
Exp/Bed$227K$261K$442K$965K
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML