Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE NEUROMEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE NEUROMEDICAL CENTER
CCN 193090 | LA | 27 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $1.9M (+$544K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$544K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+532bps
Margin Improvement
$392K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$544K
Modeled Uplift
$402K
Risk-Adjusted
-$142K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$205K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$205K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$124K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$544K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$197K$8K$205K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$205K$205K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$31K$93K$124K$392K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$51K$103K$154K$205K$205K$205K$205K
Cost to Collect$0$51K$102K$153K$205K$205K$205K$205K
A/R Days Reduction$0$41K$83K$124K$124K$124K$124K$124K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$149K$297K$441K$544K$544K$544K$544K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $544K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
9.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M13.0%
Year 1$1.4M+$363K$1.7M16.9%
Year 2$1.4M+$544K$2.0M19.1%
Year 3$1.5M+$544K$2.0M19.5%
Year 4$1.5M+$544K$2.0M19.9%
Year 5$1.5M+$544K$2.1M20.4%
$13.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$22.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.6M
Value Created
$2.1M
Exit EBITDA
$2.1M
Organic Growth
$5.4M
RCM Value Creation
$2.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$103K$154K$205K$246K
Cost to Collect$102K$153K$205K$245K
A/R Days Reduction$62K$93K$124K$149K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$272K$408K$544K$653K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 135 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.0%-17.2%-3.1%5.9%
P86
Net-to-Gross36.5%32.2%44.2%58.1%
P35
Occupancy86.7%21.1%46.3%68.5%
P96
Rev/Bed$379K$288K$468K$882K
P39
Exp/Bed$330K$276K$468K$963K
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML