Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LEESVILLE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LEESVILLE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 193086 | LA | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $852K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$328K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$852K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$328K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+544bps
Margin Improvement
$231K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$328K
Modeled Uplift
$230K
Risk-Adjusted
-$97K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$124K
+206bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$120K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$73K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+16bp
Total EBITDA Impact$328K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$116K$8K$124K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$120K$120K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$18K$55K$73K$231K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$31K$62K$93K$124K$124K$124K$124K
Cost to Collect$0$30K$60K$90K$120K$120K$120K$120K
A/R Days Reduction$0$24K$49K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$90K$181K$266K$328K$328K$328K$328K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $328K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$852K$852K14.1%
Year 1$878K+$218K$1.1M18.2%
Year 2$904K+$328K$1.2M20.4%
Year 3$931K+$328K$1.3M20.9%
Year 4$959K+$328K$1.3M21.4%
Year 5$988K+$328K$1.3M21.8%
$8.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.9M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$3.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$62K$93K$124K$149K
Cost to Collect$60K$90K$120K$145K
A/R Days Reduction$37K$55K$73K$88K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$164K$246K$328K$393K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.1%-14.3%-1.7%7.4%
P83
Net-to-Gross61.3%35.2%48.5%61.4%
P73
Occupancy68.5%20.6%45.9%64.7%
P76
Rev/Bed$377K$321K$613K$1.0M
P32
Exp/Bed$323K$291K$597K$1.2M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML