Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MMO REHAB AND WELLNESS CENTER 2026-04-26 17:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MMO REHAB AND WELLNESS CENTER
CCN 193070 | LA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $2.4M → Pro Forma $2.7M (+$356K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$356K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+541bps
Margin Improvement
$253K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$356K
Modeled Uplift
$249K
Risk-Adjusted
-$107K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$135K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$132K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$80K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+15bp
Total EBITDA Impact$356K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$127K$8K$135K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$132K$132K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$20K$60K$80K$253K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$34K$68K$101K$135K$135K$135K$135K
Cost to Collect$0$33K$66K$99K$132K$132K$132K$132K
A/R Days Reduction$0$27K$53K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$98K$196K$290K$356K$356K$356K$356K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $356K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.9x35% / 4.6x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.4M$2.4M35.9%
Year 1$2.4M+$238K$2.7M40.6%
Year 2$2.5M+$356K$2.9M43.5%
Year 3$2.6M+$356K$2.9M44.6%
Year 4$2.7M+$356K$3.0M45.8%
Year 5$2.7M+$356K$3.1M47.0%
$23.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$34.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.4M
Value Created
$3.1M
Exit EBITDA
$3.8M
Organic Growth
$3.6M
RCM Value Creation
$3.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$68K$101K$135K$162K
Cost to Collect$66K$99K$132K$158K
A/R Days Reduction$40K$60K$80K$96K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$178K$267K$356K$428K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin35.9%-4.6%4.1%17.0%
P94
Net-to-Gross52.1%37.9%49.3%66.4%
P54
Occupancy51.5%20.6%51.5%79.1%
P49
Rev/Bed$658K$337K$658K$1.0M
P49
Exp/Bed$422K$290K$422K$956K
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML