Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STERLINGTON CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 01:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STERLINGTON CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL
CCN 193069 | LA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.6M → Pro Forma $-1.2M (+$412K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 193069

STERLINGTON CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$7.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$412K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+537bps
Margin Improvement
$294K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$412K
Modeled Uplift
$306K
Risk-Adjusted
-$107K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$156K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$153K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$93K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$412K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$148K$8K$156K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$153K$153K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$24K$70K$93K$294K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$39K$78K$117K$156K$156K$156K$156K
Cost to Collect$0$38K$77K$115K$153K$153K$153K$153K
A/R Days Reduction$0$31K$62K$93K$93K$93K$93K$93K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$113K$227K$335K$412K$412K$412K$412K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $412K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.6M$-1.6M-20.5%
Year 1$-1.6M+$275K$-1.3M-17.5%
Year 2$-1.7M+$412K$-1.3M-16.3%
Year 3$-1.7M+$412K$-1.3M-17.0%
Year 4$-1.8M+$412K$-1.4M-17.7%
Year 5$-1.8M+$412K$-1.4M-18.3%
$-15.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-15.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$216K
Value Created
$-1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.5M
Organic Growth
$4.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$78K$117K$156K$187K
Cost to Collect$77K$115K$153K$184K
A/R Days Reduction$47K$70K$93K$112K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$206K$309K$412K$495K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.5%-4.6%4.1%17.0%
P9
Net-to-Gross46.9%37.9%49.3%66.4%
P34
Occupancy73.9%20.6%51.5%79.1%
P68
Rev/Bed$767K$337K$658K$1.0M
P63
Exp/Bed$924K$290K$422K$956K
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML