Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LANDRY EXTENDED CARE 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LANDRY EXTENDED CARE
CCN 192034 | LA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $146K → Pro Forma $453K (+$307K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$146K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$307K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$453K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+546bps
Margin Improvement
$216K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$307K
Modeled Uplift
$209K
Risk-Adjusted
-$98K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$116K
+207bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$112K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$68K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+17bp
Total EBITDA Impact$307K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$108K$8K$116K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$112K$112K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$17K$51K$68K$216K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$29K$58K$87K$116K$116K$116K$116K
Cost to Collect$0$28K$56K$84K$112K$112K$112K$112K
A/R Days Reduction$0$23K$46K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$85K$170K$250K$307K$307K$307K$307K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $307K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x83% / 20.6x88% / 23.2x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.2x95% / 28.5x
9.0x78% / 17.9x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.7x89% / 23.8x90% / 25.0x
10.0x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x
11.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x
12.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.4x74% / 16.2x76% / 17.1x78% / 17.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
58%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 58% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$146K$146K2.6%
Year 1$150K+$205K$355K6.3%
Year 2$155K+$307K$462K8.2%
Year 3$160K+$307K$467K8.3%
Year 4$164K+$307K$471K8.4%
Year 5$169K+$307K$476K8.5%
$1.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.8M
Value Created
$476K
Exit EBITDA
$233K
Organic Growth
$3.1M
RCM Value Creation
$476K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$58K$87K$116K$140K
Cost to Collect$56K$84K$112K$135K
A/R Days Reduction$34K$51K$68K$82K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$153K$230K$307K$368K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 130 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.6%-14.8%-2.1%6.3%
P62
Net-to-Gross55.5%33.1%46.2%59.8%
P68
Occupancy52.6%20.5%46.4%69.8%
P56
Rev/Bed$234K$288K$460K$881K
P14
Exp/Bed$228K$276K$445K$961K
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML