Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LIFECARE SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF N. LA 2026-04-26 14:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LIFECARE SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF N. LA
CCN 192022 | LA | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $359K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$830K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$359K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$830K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$605K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$830K
Modeled Uplift
$609K
Risk-Adjusted
-$221K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$316K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$312K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$192K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$830K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$316K$316K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$304K$9K$312K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$144K$192K$605K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$79K$158K$237K$316K$316K$316K$316K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$78K$156K$234K$312K$312K$312K$312K
A/R Days Reduction$0$64K$128K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$226K$452K$673K$830K$830K$830K$830K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $830K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.1x90% / 25.0x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.6x
9.0x81% / 19.3x85% / 21.8x89% / 24.3x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x
10.0x76% / 17.1x81% / 19.3x85% / 21.6x87% / 22.7x89% / 23.8x
11.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.3x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.4x84% / 21.4x
12.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.6x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.9x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.6x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$359K$359K2.3%
Year 1$369K+$553K$923K5.8%
Year 2$381K+$830K$1.2M7.7%
Year 3$392K+$830K$1.2M7.7%
Year 4$404K+$830K$1.2M7.8%
Year 5$416K+$830K$1.2M7.9%
$3.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.1M
Value Created
$1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$571K
Organic Growth
$8.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$158K$237K$316K$379K
Denial Rate Reductio$156K$234K$312K$375K
A/R Days Reduction$96K$144K$192K$230K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$415K$622K$830K$996K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 138 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.3%-16.7%-2.7%6.1%
P62
Net-to-Gross46.5%31.7%43.7%58.1%
P56
Occupancy75.5%21.1%46.4%68.5%
P84
Rev/Bed$526K$282K$460K$868K
P54
Exp/Bed$514K$272K$457K$963K
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML