Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF SHREVEPORT 2026-04-26 09:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF SHREVEPORT
CCN 192011 | LA | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-293K → Pro Forma $577K (+$870K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-293K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$870K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$577K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$635K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$870K
Modeled Uplift
$638K
Risk-Adjusted
-$232K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$331K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$328K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$201K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$870K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$331K$331K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$318K$9K$328K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$51K$151K$201K$635K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$83K$165K$248K$331K$331K$331K$331K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$82K$164K$246K$328K$328K$328K$328K
A/R Days Reduction$0$67K$134K$201K$201K$201K$201K$201K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$237K$474K$706K$870K$870K$870K$870K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $870K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.8x
Headroom (turns)
166%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 166% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.3x, adding 103.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-293K$-293K-1.8%
Year 1$-302K+$580K$278K1.7%
Year 2$-311K+$870K$559K3.4%
Year 3$-320K+$870K$550K3.3%
Year 4$-330K+$870K$540K3.3%
Year 5$-340K+$870K$530K3.2%
$-2.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.8M
Value Created
$530K
Exit EBITDA
$-467K
Organic Growth
$8.7M
RCM Value Creation
$530K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$165K$248K$331K$397K
Denial Rate Reductio$164K$246K$328K$393K
A/R Days Reduction$101K$151K$201K$242K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$435K$653K$870K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 132 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.8%-20.9%-3.5%4.9%
P53
Net-to-Gross17.8%31.6%43.2%55.8%
P5
Occupancy73.1%21.7%47.9%69.0%
P82
Rev/Bed$460K$278K$452K$807K
P51
Exp/Bed$468K$265K$445K$963K
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML