Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF NEW ORLEAN 2026-04-26 21:46 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF NEW ORLEAN
CCN 192009 | LA | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.1M → Pro Forma $-4.1M (+$944K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$944K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$688K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$944K
Modeled Uplift
$648K
Risk-Adjusted
-$296K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$359K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$355K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$218K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$944K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$359K$359K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$346K$10K$355K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$163K$218K$688K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$90K$179K$269K$359K$359K$359K$359K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$89K$178K$267K$355K$355K$355K$355K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$146K$218K$218K$218K$218K$218K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$257K$514K$766K$944K$944K$944K$944K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $944K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.1M$-5.1M-28.3%
Year 1$-5.2M+$630K$-4.6M-25.6%
Year 2$-5.4M+$944K$-4.4M-24.7%
Year 3$-5.5M+$944K$-4.6M-25.6%
Year 4$-5.7M+$944K$-4.8M-26.6%
Year 5$-5.9M+$944K$-4.9M-27.5%
$-50.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-54.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.6M
Value Created
$-4.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.1M
Organic Growth
$9.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$179K$269K$359K$431K
Denial Rate Reductio$178K$267K$355K$426K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$164K$218K$262K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$11K$14K
Total$472K$708K$944K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 132 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-28.3%-20.9%-3.5%4.9%
P19
Net-to-Gross28.2%31.6%43.2%55.8%
P20
Occupancy58.4%21.7%47.9%69.0%
P62
Rev/Bed$544K$278K$452K$807K
P56
Exp/Bed$698K$265K$445K$963K
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML