Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRIDGEPOINT CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 18:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRIDGEPOINT CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL
CCN 192007 | LA | 39 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.1M → Pro Forma $-243K (+$808K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$808K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-243K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$589K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$808K
Modeled Uplift
$574K
Risk-Adjusted
-$234K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$307K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$304K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$187K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$808K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$307K$307K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$296K$8K$304K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$47K$140K$187K$589K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$77K$154K$230K$307K$307K$307K$307K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$76K$152K$228K$304K$304K$304K$304K
A/R Days Reduction$0$62K$125K$187K$187K$187K$187K$187K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$220K$440K$655K$808K$808K$808K$808K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $808K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.1M$-1.1M-6.8%
Year 1$-1.1M+$539K$-544K-3.5%
Year 2$-1.1M+$808K$-307K-2.0%
Year 3$-1.1M+$808K$-340K-2.2%
Year 4$-1.2M+$808K$-375K-2.4%
Year 5$-1.2M+$808K$-410K-2.7%
$-10.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.0M
Value Created
$-410K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.7M
Organic Growth
$8.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-410K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$154K$230K$307K$369K
Denial Rate Reductio$152K$228K$304K$365K
A/R Days Reduction$93K$140K$187K$224K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$404K$606K$808K$970K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 126 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.8%-21.2%-3.8%4.9%
P44
Net-to-Gross29.6%31.5%42.0%56.1%
P22
Occupancy72.5%21.3%46.5%65.1%
P82
Rev/Bed$394K$273K$435K$868K
P46
Exp/Bed$421K$261K$442K$965K
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML