Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CORNERSTONE SPECIALTY BOSSIER CITY 2026-04-26 23:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CORNERSTONE SPECIALTY BOSSIER CITY
CCN 192006 | LA | 43 beds | Current EBITDA $-483K → Pro Forma $344K (+$827K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 192006

CORNERSTONE SPECIALTY BOSSIER CITY
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$15.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-483K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$827K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$344K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$603K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$827K
Modeled Uplift
$579K
Risk-Adjusted
-$248K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$314K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$311K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$191K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$827K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$314K$314K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$303K$9K$311K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$143K$191K$603K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$79K$157K$236K$314K$314K$314K$314K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$78K$156K$234K$311K$311K$311K$311K
A/R Days Reduction$0$64K$128K$191K$191K$191K$191K$191K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$225K$451K$671K$827K$827K$827K$827K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $827K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-11.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
18.4x
Headroom (turns)
283%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 283% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -11.9x, adding 110.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-483K$-483K-3.1%
Year 1$-497K+$551K$54K0.3%
Year 2$-512K+$827K$315K2.0%
Year 3$-528K+$827K$299K1.9%
Year 4$-544K+$827K$284K1.8%
Year 5$-560K+$827K$267K1.7%
$-4.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.8M
Value Created
$267K
Exit EBITDA
$-769K
Organic Growth
$8.3M
RCM Value Creation
$267K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$157K$236K$314K$377K
Denial Rate Reductio$156K$234K$311K$374K
A/R Days Reduction$96K$144K$191K$230K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$414K$620K$827K$993K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 116 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.1%-22.6%-5.0%4.3%
P53
Net-to-Gross18.8%29.4%39.5%52.1%
P8
Occupancy57.2%21.2%46.3%64.7%
P62
Rev/Bed$366K$274K$459K$885K
P40
Exp/Bed$377K$270K$468K$983K
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML