Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REEVES MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 15:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REEVES MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 191326 | LA | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $21.9M → Pro Forma $23.7M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$21.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$23.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$683K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$679K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$673K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$413K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$679K$679K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$654K$19K$673K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$309K$413K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$170K$340K$509K$679K$679K$679K$679K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$168K$336K$504K$673K$673K$673K$673K
A/R Days Reduction$0$138K$276K$413K$413K$413K$413K$413K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$487K$973K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
9.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
10.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
11.0x27% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x
12.0x23% / 2.8x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.3x
Headroom (turns)
-20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.8x, adding 0.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$21.9M$21.9M64.5%
Year 1$22.6M+$1.2M$23.7M69.9%
Year 2$23.2M+$1.8M$25.0M73.7%
Year 3$23.9M+$1.8M$25.7M75.7%
Year 4$24.6M+$1.8M$26.4M77.8%
Year 5$25.4M+$1.8M$27.2M80.0%
$219.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$298.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$79.9M
Value Created
$27.2M
Exit EBITDA
$34.9M
Organic Growth
$17.9M
RCM Value Creation
$27.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$340K$509K$679K$815K
Denial Rate Reductio$336K$504K$673K$807K
A/R Days Reduction$207K$310K$413K$496K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$893K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin64.5%-13.9%-1.7%8.4%
P99
Net-to-Gross84.3%34.2%48.6%61.4%
P92
Occupancy20.0%20.5%45.1%65.4%
P23
Rev/Bed$2.3M$335K$658K$1.1M
P87
Exp/Bed$804K$295K$602K$1.2M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML