Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LALLIE KEMP REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LALLIE KEMP REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 191321 | LA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-21.7M → Pro Forma $-20.2M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-21.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-20.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$887K
Risk-Adjusted
-$625K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$575K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$569K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$350K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$575K$575K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$553K$16K$569K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$88K$262K$350K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$144K$287K$431K$575K$575K$575K$575K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$142K$285K$427K$569K$569K$569K$569K
A/R Days Reduction$0$117K$233K$350K$350K$350K$350K$350K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$412K$824K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-21.7M$-21.7M-75.4%
Year 1$-22.3M+$1.0M$-21.3M-74.1%
Year 2$-23.0M+$1.5M$-21.5M-74.7%
Year 3$-23.7M+$1.5M$-22.2M-77.1%
Year 4$-24.4M+$1.5M$-22.9M-79.6%
Year 5$-25.1M+$1.5M$-23.6M-82.1%
$-216.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-259.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-43.0M
Value Created
$-23.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-34.5M
Organic Growth
$15.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-23.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$287K$431K$575K$690K
Denial Rate Reductio$285K$427K$569K$683K
A/R Days Reduction$175K$262K$350K$420K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$756K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 130 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-14.8%-2.1%6.3%
P0
Net-to-Gross48.5%33.1%46.2%59.8%
P55
Occupancy11.1%20.5%46.4%69.8%
P9
Rev/Bed$1.2M$288K$460K$881K
P87
Exp/Bed$2.1M$276K$445K$961K
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML