Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JACKSON PARISH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JACKSON PARISH HOSPITAL
CCN 191317 | LA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.7M → Pro Forma $-3.6M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$797K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$658K
Risk-Adjusted
-$436K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$416K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$412K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$253K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$416K$416K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$400K$11K$412K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$64K$189K$253K$797K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$104K$208K$312K$416K$416K$416K$416K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$103K$206K$309K$412K$412K$412K$412K
A/R Days Reduction$0$84K$169K$253K$253K$253K$253K$253K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$298K$595K$887K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.7M$-4.7M-22.5%
Year 1$-4.8M+$729K$-4.1M-19.6%
Year 2$-5.0M+$1.1M$-3.9M-18.6%
Year 3$-5.1M+$1.1M$-4.0M-19.3%
Year 4$-5.3M+$1.1M$-4.2M-20.0%
Year 5$-5.4M+$1.1M$-4.3M-20.8%
$-46.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-47.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-828K
Value Created
$-4.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.4M
Organic Growth
$10.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$208K$312K$416K$499K
Denial Rate Reductio$206K$309K$412K$494K
A/R Days Reduction$126K$190K$253K$303K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$547K$820K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 131 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.5%-15.4%-3.1%5.9%
P20
Net-to-Gross64.4%32.3%44.2%58.3%
P80
Occupancy19.9%20.7%46.1%68.5%
P22
Rev/Bed$831K$288K$468K$882K
P73
Exp/Bed$1.0M$276K$468K$963K
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML