Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BUNKIE GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BUNKIE GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 191311 | LA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-301K → Pro Forma $638K (+$939K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-301K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$939K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$638K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$684K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$939K
Modeled Uplift
$581K
Risk-Adjusted
-$358K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$357K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$353K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$217K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$939K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$357K$357K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$343K$10K$353K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$162K$217K$684K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$89K$178K$268K$357K$357K$357K$357K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$88K$177K$265K$353K$353K$353K$353K
A/R Days Reduction$0$72K$145K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$256K$511K$761K$939K$939K$939K$939K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $939K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.5x
Headroom (turns)
161%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 161% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.0x, adding 103.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-301K$-301K-1.7%
Year 1$-310K+$626K$316K1.8%
Year 2$-319K+$939K$620K3.5%
Year 3$-329K+$939K$610K3.4%
Year 4$-339K+$939K$600K3.4%
Year 5$-349K+$939K$590K3.3%
$-3.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.5M
Value Created
$590K
Exit EBITDA
$-479K
Organic Growth
$9.4M
RCM Value Creation
$590K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$178K$268K$357K$428K
Denial Rate Reductio$177K$265K$353K$424K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$163K$217K$261K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$11K$14K
Total$469K$704K$939K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 130 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.7%-14.8%-2.1%6.3%
P52
Net-to-Gross58.0%33.1%46.2%59.8%
P72
Occupancy22.4%20.5%46.4%69.8%
P29
Rev/Bed$743K$288K$460K$881K
P70
Exp/Bed$756K$276K$445K$961K
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML