Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DEQUINCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DEQUINCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 191307 | LA | 19 beds | Current EBITDA $-534K → Pro Forma $157K (+$691K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-534K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$691K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$157K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$502K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$691K
Modeled Uplift
$423K
Risk-Adjusted
-$268K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$262K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$260K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$159K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$691K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$262K$262K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$252K$8K$260K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$40K$119K$159K$502K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$65K$131K$196K$262K$262K$262K$262K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$65K$130K$195K$260K$260K$260K$260K
A/R Days Reduction$0$53K$106K$159K$159K$159K$159K$159K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$188K$377K$561K$691K$691K$691K$691K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $691K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-28.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
35.3x
Headroom (turns)
544%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 544% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -28.8x, adding 127.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-534K$-534K-4.1%
Year 1$-550K+$461K$-90K-0.7%
Year 2$-567K+$691K$124K0.9%
Year 3$-584K+$691K$107K0.8%
Year 4$-601K+$691K$90K0.7%
Year 5$-619K+$691K$72K0.5%
$-5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$788K
Exit EV (11x)
$6.1M
Value Created
$72K
Exit EBITDA
$-851K
Organic Growth
$6.9M
RCM Value Creation
$72K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$131K$196K$262K$314K
Denial Rate Reductio$130K$195K$260K$312K
A/R Days Reduction$80K$119K$159K$191K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$346K$518K$691K$829K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 114 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.1%-14.8%-1.8%8.0%
P46
Net-to-Gross68.3%33.9%47.3%61.4%
P86
Occupancy27.3%20.5%46.4%68.5%
P35
Rev/Bed$689K$290K$548K$1.0M
P61
Exp/Bed$717K$279K$588K$1.0M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML