Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JAMES PARISH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JAMES PARISH HOSPITAL
CCN 191305 | LA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $2.4M → Pro Forma $4.2M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$716K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$677K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$670K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$412K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$677K$677K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$652K$19K$670K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$308K$412K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$169K$339K$508K$677K$677K$677K$677K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$168K$335K$503K$670K$670K$670K$670K
A/R Days Reduction$0$137K$275K$412K$412K$412K$412K$412K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$485K$970K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.2x
9.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.4M$2.4M7.2%
Year 1$2.5M+$1.2M$3.7M10.9%
Year 2$2.6M+$1.8M$4.3M12.9%
Year 3$2.6M+$1.8M$4.4M13.1%
Year 4$2.7M+$1.8M$4.5M13.3%
Year 5$2.8M+$1.8M$4.6M13.6%
$24.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$50.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.3M
Value Created
$4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$3.9M
Organic Growth
$17.8M
RCM Value Creation
$4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$339K$508K$677K$812K
Denial Rate Reductio$335K$503K$670K$804K
A/R Days Reduction$206K$309K$412K$494K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$890K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 131 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.2%-15.4%-3.1%5.9%
P78
Net-to-Gross55.3%32.3%44.2%58.3%
P68
Occupancy17.0%20.7%46.1%68.5%
P18
Rev/Bed$1.4M$288K$468K$882K
P89
Exp/Bed$1.3M$276K$468K$963K
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML