Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OUR LADY OF THE LAKE ASSUMPTION COM 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OUR LADY OF THE LAKE ASSUMPTION COM
CCN 191303 | LA | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $2.8M → Pro Forma $3.4M (+$620K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$620K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$449K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

55%
Realization (C)
$620K
Modeled Uplift
$343K
Risk-Adjusted
-$277K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 55% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$234K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$234K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$142K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$620K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$234K$234K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$225K$8K$234K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$36K$107K$142K$449K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$59K$117K$176K$234K$234K$234K$234K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$58K$117K$175K$234K$234K$234K$234K
A/R Days Reduction$0$47K$95K$142K$142K$142K$142K$142K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$169K$339K$503K$620K$620K$620K$620K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $620K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.8M$2.8M24.2%
Year 1$2.9M+$413K$3.3M28.4%
Year 2$3.0M+$620K$3.6M30.9%
Year 3$3.1M+$620K$3.7M31.7%
Year 4$3.2M+$620K$3.8M32.5%
Year 5$3.3M+$620K$3.9M33.3%
$28.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$42.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.6M
Value Created
$3.9M
Exit EBITDA
$4.5M
Organic Growth
$6.2M
RCM Value Creation
$3.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$117K$176K$234K$281K
Denial Rate Reductio$117K$175K$234K$280K
A/R Days Reduction$71K$107K$142K$171K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$310K$465K$620K$744K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.2%-13.9%-1.7%8.4%
P93
Net-to-Gross80.7%34.2%48.6%61.4%
P90
Occupancy0.1%20.5%45.1%65.4%
P0
Rev/Bed$781K$335K$658K$1.1M
P61
Exp/Bed$592K$295K$602K$1.2M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML