Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNION GENERAL HOSPITAL INC. 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNION GENERAL HOSPITAL INC.
CCN 191301 | LA | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $459K → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$459K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$783K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$651K
Risk-Adjusted
-$423K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$408K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$404K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$248K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$408K$408K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$393K$11K$404K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$63K$186K$248K$783K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$102K$204K$306K$408K$408K$408K$408K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$101K$202K$303K$404K$404K$404K$404K
A/R Days Reduction$0$83K$166K$248K$248K$248K$248K$248K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$292K$585K$871K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.2x95% / 28.0x97% / 29.5x99% / 30.9x
9.0x81% / 19.5x86% / 22.0x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.8x93% / 27.1x
10.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x
11.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x85% / 21.6x
12.0x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$459K$459K2.2%
Year 1$473K+$716K$1.2M5.8%
Year 2$487K+$1.1M$1.6M7.6%
Year 3$501K+$1.1M$1.6M7.7%
Year 4$516K+$1.1M$1.6M7.8%
Year 5$532K+$1.1M$1.6M7.9%
$4.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.1M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$731K
Organic Growth
$10.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$204K$306K$408K$490K
Denial Rate Reductio$202K$303K$404K$485K
A/R Days Reduction$124K$186K$248K$298K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$537K$806K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 127 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-15.4%-2.3%7.2%
P58
Net-to-Gross67.4%32.3%45.9%59.6%
P86
Occupancy20.4%20.5%46.1%69.5%
P25
Rev/Bed$1.0M$290K$537K$964K
P78
Exp/Bed$998K$277K$514K$985K
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML