Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AVAIL HOSPITAL LAKE CHARLES 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AVAIL HOSPITAL LAKE CHARLES
CCN 190315 | LA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.1M → Pro Forma $-4.5M (+$591K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$591K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$427K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$591K
Modeled Uplift
$362K
Risk-Adjusted
-$228K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$223K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$223K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$136K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$591K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$223K$223K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$214K$8K$223K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$34K$101K$136K$427K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$56K$111K$167K$223K$223K$223K$223K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$56K$111K$167K$223K$223K$223K$223K
A/R Days Reduction$0$45K$90K$136K$136K$136K$136K$136K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$161K$323K$479K$591K$591K$591K$591K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $591K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.1M$-5.1M-45.5%
Year 1$-5.2M+$394K$-4.8M-43.3%
Year 2$-5.4M+$591K$-4.8M-43.0%
Year 3$-5.5M+$591K$-5.0M-44.4%
Year 4$-5.7M+$591K$-5.1M-45.9%
Year 5$-5.9M+$591K$-5.3M-47.5%
$-50.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-58.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-7.5M
Value Created
$-5.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.1M
Organic Growth
$5.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$111K$167K$223K$267K
Denial Rate Reductio$111K$167K$223K$267K
A/R Days Reduction$68K$102K$136K$163K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$295K$443K$591K$709K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-45.5%-4.6%4.1%17.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross10.0%37.9%49.3%66.4%
P0
Occupancy18.8%20.6%51.5%79.1%
P16
Rev/Bed$1.1M$337K$658K$1.0M
P77
Exp/Bed$1.6M$290K$422K$956K
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML