Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTRAL LOUISIANA SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTRAL LOUISIANA SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 190298 | LA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $5.3M → Pro Forma $8.9M (+$3.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$69.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$3.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$841K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$44K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$212K$629K$841K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$44K$44K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$346K$691K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$342K$684K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$280K$561K$841K$841K$841K$841K$841K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K
Cumulative$0$990K$2.0M$2.9M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.2x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x
9.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.8x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.3M$5.3M7.7%
Year 1$5.5M+$2.4M$7.9M11.4%
Year 2$5.6M+$3.6M$9.3M13.4%
Year 3$5.8M+$3.6M$9.4M13.6%
Year 4$6.0M+$3.6M$9.6M13.9%
Year 5$6.1M+$3.6M$9.8M14.1%
$52.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$107.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.6M
Value Created
$9.8M
Exit EBITDA
$8.4M
Organic Growth
$36.4M
RCM Value Creation
$9.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$691K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$684K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$421K$631K$841K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$22K$33K$44K$53K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 130 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.7%-14.8%-2.1%6.3%
P78
Net-to-Gross11.9%33.1%46.2%59.8%
P0
Occupancy12.1%20.5%46.4%69.8%
P10
Rev/Bed$2.9M$288K$460K$881K
P96
Exp/Bed$2.7M$276K$445K$961K
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML