Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF SLIDELL LLC 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF SLIDELL LLC
CCN 190256 | LA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $4.4M → Pro Forma $5.5M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$796K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$687K
Risk-Adjusted
-$404K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$415K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$411K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$252K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$415K$415K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$399K$11K$411K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$64K$189K$252K$796K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$104K$207K$311K$415K$415K$415K$415K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$103K$205K$308K$411K$411K$411K$411K
A/R Days Reduction$0$84K$168K$252K$252K$252K$252K$252K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$297K$594K$885K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.8x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.4M$4.4M21.0%
Year 1$4.5M+$728K$5.2M25.1%
Year 2$4.6M+$1.1M$5.7M27.5%
Year 3$4.8M+$1.1M$5.9M28.2%
Year 4$4.9M+$1.1M$6.0M28.9%
Year 5$5.1M+$1.1M$6.1M29.6%
$43.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$67.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.0M
Value Created
$6.1M
Exit EBITDA
$6.9M
Organic Growth
$10.9M
RCM Value Creation
$6.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$207K$311K$415K$498K
Denial Rate Reductio$205K$308K$411K$493K
A/R Days Reduction$126K$189K$252K$303K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$546K$819K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.0%-4.6%4.1%17.0%
P80
Net-to-Gross16.8%37.9%49.3%66.4%
P3
Occupancy20.6%20.6%51.5%79.1%
P24
Rev/Bed$2.1M$337K$658K$1.0M
P80
Exp/Bed$1.6M$290K$422K$956K
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML