Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PARK PLACE SURGERY CENTER 2026-04-26 17:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PARK PLACE SURGERY CENTER
CCN 190255 | LA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $7.9M → Pro Forma $10.6M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$51.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$939K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$628K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$994K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$158K$470K$628K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$258K$516K$775K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$256K$511K$767K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$209K$419K$628K$628K$628K$628K$628K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$740K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.9M$7.9M15.4%
Year 1$8.2M+$1.8M$10.0M19.3%
Year 2$8.4M+$2.7M$11.1M21.6%
Year 3$8.7M+$2.7M$11.4M22.0%
Year 4$8.9M+$2.7M$11.6M22.5%
Year 5$9.2M+$2.7M$11.9M23.1%
$79.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$131.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$51.7M
Value Created
$11.9M
Exit EBITDA
$12.6M
Organic Growth
$27.2M
RCM Value Creation
$11.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$516K$775K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$511K$767K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$314K$471K$628K$754K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$25K$33K$40K
Total$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.4%-4.6%4.1%17.0%
P69
Net-to-Gross25.5%37.9%49.3%66.4%
P9
Occupancy13.8%20.6%51.5%79.1%
P11
Rev/Bed$5.2M$337K$658K$1.0M
P94
Exp/Bed$4.4M$290K$422K$956K
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML