Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SABINE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SABINE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 190218 | LA | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $2.5M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$845K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

57%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$660K
Risk-Adjusted
-$498K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 57% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$440K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$436K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$268K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$440K$440K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$424K$12K$436K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$68K$200K$268K$845K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$110K$220K$330K$440K$440K$440K$440K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$109K$218K$327K$436K$436K$436K$436K
A/R Days Reduction$0$89K$179K$268K$268K$268K$268K$268K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$315K$631K$939K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
9.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
10.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x65% / 12.4x
11.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
12.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M6.2%
Year 1$1.4M+$772K$2.2M9.9%
Year 2$1.5M+$1.2M$2.6M11.8%
Year 3$1.5M+$1.2M$2.7M12.0%
Year 4$1.5M+$1.2M$2.7M12.3%
Year 5$1.6M+$1.2M$2.7M12.5%
$13.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$30.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.5M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$11.6M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$220K$330K$440K$528K
Denial Rate Reductio$218K$327K$436K$523K
A/R Days Reduction$134K$201K$268K$322K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$579K$869K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 113 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.2%-22.9%-4.9%4.1%
P80
Net-to-Gross50.1%29.0%39.3%52.0%
P70
Occupancy5.7%22.0%46.4%67.8%
P2
Rev/Bed$459K$272K$445K$882K
P50
Exp/Bed$430K$267K$447K$965K
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML