Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TULANE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL & CLINICS 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TULANE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL & CLINICS
CCN 190176 | LA | 431 beds | Current EBITDA $-69.0M → Pro Forma $-43.2M (+$25.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$490.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-69.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-43.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$25.8M
Modeled Uplift
$16.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.0M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.8M (vs $25.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$314K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.8M$9.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.4M$270K$9.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.5M$6.0M$18.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$314K$314K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.4M$9.8M$9.8M$9.8M$9.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.9M$7.3M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$157K$314K$314K$314K$314K$314K$314K
Cumulative$0$7.0M$14.0M$20.9M$25.8M$25.8M$25.8M$25.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-69.0M$-69.0M-14.1%
Year 1$-71.1M+$17.2M$-53.9M-11.0%
Year 2$-73.2M+$25.8M$-47.4M-9.7%
Year 3$-75.4M+$25.8M$-49.6M-10.1%
Year 4$-77.6M+$25.8M$-51.9M-10.6%
Year 5$-80.0M+$25.8M$-54.2M-11.1%
$-689.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-596.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$93.8M
Value Created
$-54.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-109.9M
Organic Growth
$257.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-54.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.9M$7.4M$9.8M$11.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.9M$7.3M$9.7M$11.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Clean Claim Rate$157K$235K$314K$376K
Total$12.9M$19.3M$25.8M$30.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.1%-16.4%-6.7%-1.1%
P29
Net-to-Gross10.6%18.8%25.0%30.6%
P5
Occupancy54.4%53.1%65.4%72.5%
P29
Rev/Bed$1.1M$948K$1.2M$1.4M
P38
Exp/Bed$1.3M$959K$1.3M$1.5M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML