Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BYRD REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BYRD REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 190164 | LA | 39 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $4.8M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$61.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$743K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$187K$556K$743K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$305K$611K$916K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$302K$605K$907K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$248K$496K$743K$743K$743K$743K$743K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$875K$1.8M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x83% / 20.4x87% / 23.0x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x95% / 28.3x
9.0x78% / 17.8x82% / 20.1x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.8x
10.0x73% / 15.7x78% / 17.8x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x85% / 22.0x
11.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x
12.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
58%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 58% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M2.5%
Year 1$1.6M+$2.1M$3.7M6.1%
Year 2$1.6M+$3.2M$4.9M8.0%
Year 3$1.7M+$3.2M$4.9M8.0%
Year 4$1.7M+$3.2M$5.0M8.1%
Year 5$1.8M+$3.2M$5.0M8.2%
$15.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$55.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.6M
Value Created
$5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$2.5M
Organic Growth
$32.1M
RCM Value Creation
$5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$611K$916K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$605K$907K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$372K$557K$743K$892K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$29K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 126 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.5%-21.2%-3.8%4.9%
P66
Net-to-Gross15.7%31.5%42.0%56.1%
P2
Occupancy29.1%21.3%46.5%65.1%
P35
Rev/Bed$1.6M$273K$435K$868K
P93
Exp/Bed$1.5M$261K$442K$965K
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML