Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WOMANS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WOMANS HOSPITAL
CCN 190128 | LA | 228 beds | Current EBITDA $-30.5M → Pro Forma $-12.4M (+$18.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$345.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-30.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-12.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$18.2M
Modeled Uplift
$13.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.1M (vs $18.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$221K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.9M$6.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.7M$190K$6.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.1M$4.2M$13.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$221K$221K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$111K$221K$221K$221K$221K$221K$221K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$9.9M$14.8M$18.2M$18.2M$18.2M$18.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-30.5M$-30.5M-8.8%
Year 1$-31.5M+$12.1M$-19.3M-5.6%
Year 2$-32.4M+$18.2M$-14.2M-4.1%
Year 3$-33.4M+$18.2M$-15.2M-4.4%
Year 4$-34.4M+$18.2M$-16.2M-4.7%
Year 5$-35.4M+$18.2M$-17.2M-5.0%
$-305.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-189.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$116.0M
Value Created
$-17.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-48.6M
Organic Growth
$181.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-17.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$111K$166K$221K$266K
Total$9.1M$13.6M$18.2M$21.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.8%-16.4%-6.7%-1.1%
P41
Net-to-Gross51.8%18.8%24.7%30.6%
P95
Occupancy76.4%47.4%57.2%72.3%
P84
Rev/Bed$1.5M$614K$1.1M$1.5M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.7M$592K$1.3M$1.6M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML