Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OUR LADY OF LOURDES RMC 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OUR LADY OF LOURDES RMC
CCN 190102 | LA | 363 beds | Current EBITDA $45.4M → Pro Forma $72.2M (+$26.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$509.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$45.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$26.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$72.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$26.8M
Modeled Uplift
$18.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.7M (vs $26.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$326K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$26.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.2M$10.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.8M$280K$10.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.6M$6.2M$19.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$326K$326K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.5M$5.1M$7.6M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.6M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$163K$326K$326K$326K$326K$326K$326K
Cumulative$0$7.3M$14.6M$21.7M$26.8M$26.8M$26.8M$26.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $26.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.6x61% / 11.0x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
9.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
10.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
11.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x
12.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$45.4M$45.4M8.9%
Year 1$46.8M+$17.9M$64.6M12.7%
Year 2$48.2M+$26.8M$75.0M14.7%
Year 3$49.6M+$26.8M$76.4M15.0%
Year 4$51.1M+$26.8M$77.9M15.3%
Year 5$52.6M+$26.8M$79.5M15.6%
$454.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$874.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$419.9M
Value Created
$79.5M
Exit EBITDA
$72.3M
Organic Growth
$268.1M
RCM Value Creation
$79.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.1M$7.6M$10.2M$12.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.0M$7.6M$10.1M$12.1M
A/R Days Reduction$3.1M$4.7M$6.2M$7.4M
Clean Claim Rate$163K$245K$326K$391K
Total$13.4M$20.1M$26.8M$32.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.9%-14.1%-5.9%2.3%
P96
Net-to-Gross27.1%18.8%24.7%30.6%
P60
Occupancy71.4%54.4%66.7%73.4%
P60
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.0M$1.4M$1.5M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.0M$1.4M$1.9M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML