Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BATON ROUGE GENERAL 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BATON ROUGE GENERAL
CCN 190065 | LA | 251 beds | Current EBITDA $-29.9M → Pro Forma $-6.5M (+$23.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$445.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-29.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$23.4M
Modeled Uplift
$16.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.6M (vs $23.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$285K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.6M$245K$8.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.4M$17.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$285K$285K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$143K$285K$285K$285K$285K$285K$285K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.8M$19.0M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-29.9M$-29.9M-6.7%
Year 1$-30.8M+$15.6M$-15.2M-3.4%
Year 2$-31.8M+$23.4M$-8.3M-1.9%
Year 3$-32.7M+$23.4M$-9.3M-2.1%
Year 4$-33.7M+$23.4M$-10.3M-2.3%
Year 5$-34.7M+$23.4M$-11.3M-2.5%
$-299.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-124.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$175.4M
Value Created
$-11.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-47.7M
Organic Growth
$234.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-11.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$143K$214K$285K$342K
Total$11.7M$17.6M$23.4M$28.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.7%-14.7%-7.5%-0.5%
P50
Net-to-Gross36.3%19.0%24.8%30.8%
P88
Occupancy72.5%49.3%55.9%73.4%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.8M$782K$1.2M$1.5M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.9M$756K$1.3M$1.7M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML