Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HIGHLAND MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HIGHLAND MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 190041 | LA | 198 beds | Current EBITDA $-11.7M → Pro Forma $3.3M (+$15.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$285.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-11.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$15.0M
Modeled Uplift
$10.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.3M (vs $15.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$182K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.7M$5.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.5M$157K$5.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$875K$2.6M$3.5M$10.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$182K$182K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$91K$182K$182K$182K$182K$182K$182K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.2M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-29.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
36.1x
Headroom (turns)
555%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 555% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -29.6x, adding 128.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-11.7M$-11.7M-4.1%
Year 1$-12.0M+$10.0M$-2.0M-0.7%
Year 2$-12.4M+$15.0M$2.6M0.9%
Year 3$-12.7M+$15.0M$2.3M0.8%
Year 4$-13.1M+$15.0M$1.9M0.7%
Year 5$-13.5M+$15.0M$1.5M0.5%
$-116.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$132.9M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-18.6M
Organic Growth
$150.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$91K$137K$182K$219K
Total$7.5M$11.2M$15.0M$18.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.1%-17.4%-6.3%0.7%
P55
Net-to-Gross17.8%19.2%24.9%32.4%
P17
Occupancy58.4%43.7%58.4%71.7%
P49
Rev/Bed$1.4M$440K$1.1M$1.5M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.5M$488K$1.1M$1.6M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML