Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SLIDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SLIDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 190040 | LA | 231 beds | Current EBITDA $-19.9M → Pro Forma $-7.4M (+$12.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$237.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-19.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$12.5M
Modeled Uplift
$8.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.1M (vs $12.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$152K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.7M$4.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.6M$130K$4.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$727K$2.2M$2.9M$9.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$152K$152K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$961K$1.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$76K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K
Cumulative$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.1M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-19.9M$-19.9M-8.4%
Year 1$-20.5M+$8.3M$-12.2M-5.1%
Year 2$-21.1M+$12.5M$-8.6M-3.6%
Year 3$-21.7M+$12.5M$-9.3M-3.9%
Year 4$-22.4M+$12.5M$-9.9M-4.2%
Year 5$-23.0M+$12.5M$-10.6M-4.5%
$-198.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-116.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$82.4M
Value Created
$-10.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-31.7M
Organic Growth
$124.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-10.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$5.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$76K$114K$152K$182K
Total$6.2M$9.4M$12.5M$15.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.4%-16.8%-7.5%-0.5%
P44
Net-to-Gross16.0%18.5%24.1%30.8%
P11
Occupancy43.7%46.7%55.9%72.5%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.0M$576K$1.1M$1.5M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.1M$548K$1.3M$1.5M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML