Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WEST JEFFERSON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WEST JEFFERSON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 190039 | LA | 199 beds | Current EBITDA $-39.3M → Pro Forma $-21.9M (+$17.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$329.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-39.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-21.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$17.4M
Modeled Uplift
$12.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.5M (vs $17.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$211K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.6M$6.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.4M$181K$6.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.0M$4.0M$12.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$211K$211K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$106K$211K$211K$211K$211K$211K$211K
Cumulative$0$4.7M$9.5M$14.1M$17.4M$17.4M$17.4M$17.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-39.3M$-39.3M-11.9%
Year 1$-40.4M+$11.6M$-28.9M-8.7%
Year 2$-41.7M+$17.4M$-24.3M-7.4%
Year 3$-42.9M+$17.4M$-25.5M-7.7%
Year 4$-44.2M+$17.4M$-26.8M-8.1%
Year 5$-45.5M+$17.4M$-28.2M-8.5%
$-392.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-309.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$82.9M
Value Created
$-28.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-62.5M
Organic Growth
$173.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-28.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$106K$158K$211K$253K
Total$8.7M$13.0M$17.4M$20.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.9%-17.4%-6.3%0.7%
P31
Net-to-Gross19.1%19.2%24.9%32.4%
P24
Occupancy74.1%43.7%58.4%71.7%
P84
Rev/Bed$1.7M$440K$1.1M$1.5M
P79
Exp/Bed$1.9M$488K$1.1M$1.6M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML