Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ABBEVILLE GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ABBEVILLE GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 190034 | LA | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $2.3M → Pro Forma $5.9M (+$3.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$68.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$833K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$44K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$210K$623K$833K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$44K$44K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$342K$685K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$339K$678K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$278K$556K$833K$833K$833K$833K$833K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K
Cumulative$0$981K$2.0M$2.9M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x75% / 16.5x80% / 18.7x84% / 20.9x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x
9.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x
10.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x
11.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
12.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
49%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 49% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.3M$2.3M3.4%
Year 1$2.4M+$2.4M$4.8M7.0%
Year 2$2.5M+$3.6M$6.1M8.9%
Year 3$2.5M+$3.6M$6.1M9.0%
Year 4$2.6M+$3.6M$6.2M9.1%
Year 5$2.7M+$3.6M$6.3M9.2%
$23.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$69.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$46.0M
Value Created
$6.3M
Exit EBITDA
$3.7M
Organic Growth
$36.0M
RCM Value Creation
$6.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$685K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$678K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$417K$625K$833K$1000K
Clean Claim Rate$22K$33K$44K$53K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 117 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.4%-22.5%-4.9%4.2%
P70
Net-to-Gross37.8%29.0%39.3%52.0%
P44
Occupancy41.0%21.3%46.0%64.6%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.6M$275K$460K$894K
P93
Exp/Bed$1.5M$270K$468K$971K
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML