Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAVOY MEDICAL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC. 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAVOY MEDICAL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
CCN 190025 | LA | 28 beds | Current EBITDA $-442K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-442K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$646K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$653K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$646K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$397K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$653K$653K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$628K$18K$646K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$100K$297K$397K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$163K$326K$490K$653K$653K$653K$653K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$162K$323K$485K$646K$646K$646K$646K
A/R Days Reduction$0$132K$265K$397K$397K$397K$397K$397K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$468K$935K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.4x
Headroom (turns)
145%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 145% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.9x, adding 101.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-442K$-442K-1.4%
Year 1$-455K+$1.1M$689K2.1%
Year 2$-469K+$1.7M$1.2M3.8%
Year 3$-483K+$1.7M$1.2M3.8%
Year 4$-497K+$1.7M$1.2M3.7%
Year 5$-512K+$1.7M$1.2M3.7%
$-4.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.7M
Value Created
$1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-704K
Organic Growth
$17.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$326K$490K$653K$783K
Denial Rate Reductio$323K$485K$646K$775K
A/R Days Reduction$199K$298K$397K$477K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$16K$21K$25K
Total$858K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 136 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.4%-16.7%-3.3%5.7%
P54
Net-to-Gross25.8%31.8%44.1%58.1%
P13
Occupancy20.5%21.1%46.4%69.1%
P24
Rev/Bed$1.2M$288K$466K$882K
P85
Exp/Bed$1.2M$276K$468K$963K
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML