Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIDGE 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIDGE
CCN 184009 | KY | 110 beds | Current EBITDA $17.0M → Pro Forma $19.0M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$715K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$765K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$758K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$466K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$765K$765K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$737K$21K$758K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$117K$348K$466K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$191K$383K$574K$765K$765K$765K$765K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$189K$379K$568K$758K$758K$758K$758K
A/R Days Reduction$0$155K$310K$466K$466K$466K$466K$466K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$548K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
9.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
10.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
11.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x
12.0x24% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x34% / 4.4x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.1x
Headroom (turns)
-16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.6x, adding 0.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.0M$17.0M44.4%
Year 1$17.5M+$1.3M$18.8M49.2%
Year 2$18.0M+$2.0M$20.0M52.4%
Year 3$18.6M+$2.0M$20.6M53.8%
Year 4$19.1M+$2.0M$21.1M55.2%
Year 5$19.7M+$2.0M$21.7M56.7%
$169.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$238.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$68.9M
Value Created
$21.7M
Exit EBITDA
$27.1M
Organic Growth
$20.1M
RCM Value Creation
$21.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$383K$574K$765K$919K
Denial Rate Reductio$379K$568K$758K$909K
A/R Days Reduction$233K$349K$466K$559K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin44.4%-10.1%0.7%10.3%
P98
Net-to-Gross85.9%18.0%27.8%42.7%
P98
Occupancy54.0%40.8%52.9%65.5%
P53
Rev/Bed$348K$420K$971K$1.5M
P21
Exp/Bed$193K$390K$1.0M$1.5M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML