Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - KENTUCKY 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - KENTUCKY
CCN 184006 | KY | 197 beds | Current EBITDA $15.4M → Pro Forma $18.6M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$60.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$740K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$187K$553K$740K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$304K$608K$912K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$301K$602K$903K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$247K$493K$740K$740K$740K$740K$740K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$871K$1.7M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.4M$15.4M25.3%
Year 1$15.8M+$2.1M$18.0M29.6%
Year 2$16.3M+$3.2M$19.5M32.1%
Year 3$16.8M+$3.2M$20.0M32.9%
Year 4$17.3M+$3.2M$20.5M33.7%
Year 5$17.8M+$3.2M$21.0M34.6%
$153.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$231.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$77.5M
Value Created
$21.0M
Exit EBITDA
$24.5M
Organic Growth
$32.0M
RCM Value Creation
$21.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$608K$912K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$602K$903K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$370K$555K$740K$888K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$29K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.3%-10.5%-0.5%6.2%
P91
Net-to-Gross76.4%18.6%29.2%34.6%
P91
Occupancy46.0%50.7%57.8%65.0%
P15
Rev/Bed$309K$971K$1.4M$1.6M
P6
Exp/Bed$230K$779K$1.5M$1.8M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML