Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EASTERN STATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EASTERN STATE HOSPITAL
CCN 184004 | KY | 195 beds | Current EBITDA $-11.4M → Pro Forma $-8.7M (+$2.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$52.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-11.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-8.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$914K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$638K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$34K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$29K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$161K$477K$638K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$34K$34K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$262K$524K$786K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$259K$519K$778K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$213K$425K$638K$638K$638K$638K$638K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Cumulative$0$751K$1.5M$2.2M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-11.4M$-11.4M-21.8%
Year 1$-11.8M+$1.8M$-9.9M-19.0%
Year 2$-12.1M+$2.8M$-9.4M-17.9%
Year 3$-12.5M+$2.8M$-9.7M-18.6%
Year 4$-12.9M+$2.8M$-10.1M-19.3%
Year 5$-13.3M+$2.8M$-10.5M-20.0%
$-114.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-115.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.2M
Value Created
$-10.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-18.2M
Organic Growth
$27.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-10.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$524K$786K$1.0M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$519K$778K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$319K$478K$638K$765K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$25K$34K$40K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-21.8%-10.5%-0.5%6.2%
P9
Net-to-Gross85.3%18.6%29.2%34.6%
P94
Occupancy69.4%50.7%57.8%65.0%
P76
Rev/Bed$269K$971K$1.4M$1.6M
P3
Exp/Bed$327K$779K$1.5M$1.8M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML