Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CONTINUECARE HOSPITAL MADISONVILLE 2026-04-26 12:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CONTINUECARE HOSPITAL MADISONVILLE
CCN 182009 | KY | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $-177K → Pro Forma $237K (+$414K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-177K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$414K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$237K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+537bps
Margin Improvement
$295K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$414K
Modeled Uplift
$262K
Risk-Adjusted
-$152K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$157K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$154K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$94K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$414K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$148K$8K$157K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$154K$154K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$24K$70K$94K$295K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$39K$78K$117K$157K$157K$157K$157K
Cost to Collect$0$39K$77K$116K$154K$154K$154K$154K
A/R Days Reduction$0$31K$62K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$114K$227K$336K$414K$414K$414K$414K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $414K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
12.8x
Headroom (turns)
197%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 197% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.3x, adding 105.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-177K$-177K-2.3%
Year 1$-182K+$276K$94K1.2%
Year 2$-187K+$414K$226K2.9%
Year 3$-193K+$414K$221K2.9%
Year 4$-199K+$414K$215K2.8%
Year 5$-205K+$414K$209K2.7%
$-1.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.1M
Value Created
$209K
Exit EBITDA
$-281K
Organic Growth
$4.1M
RCM Value Creation
$209K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$78K$117K$157K$188K
Cost to Collect$77K$116K$154K$185K
A/R Days Reduction$47K$70K$94K$112K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$207K$310K$414K$497K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 61 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.3%-11.1%-2.3%7.4%
P49
Net-to-Gross27.2%26.2%30.7%40.4%
P31
Occupancy35.6%25.7%35.9%53.5%
P46
Rev/Bed$220K$624K$868K$1.4M
P2
Exp/Bed$225K$654K$1.0M$1.3M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML