Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CONTINUECARE HOSPITAL AT BAPTIST HEA 2026-04-26 18:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CONTINUECARE HOSPITAL AT BAPTIST HEA
CCN 182008 | KY | 37 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$567K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$567K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$410K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$567K
Modeled Uplift
$367K
Risk-Adjusted
-$200K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$214K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$214K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$130K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$567K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$206K$8K$214K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$214K$214K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$33K$97K$130K$410K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$53K$107K$160K$214K$214K$214K$214K
Cost to Collect$0$53K$107K$160K$214K$214K$214K$214K
A/R Days Reduction$0$43K$87K$130K$130K$130K$130K$130K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$155K$310K$460K$567K$567K$567K$567K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $567K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M15.2%
Year 1$1.7M+$378K$2.0M19.2%
Year 2$1.7M+$567K$2.3M21.4%
Year 3$1.8M+$567K$2.3M21.9%
Year 4$1.8M+$567K$2.4M22.4%
Year 5$1.9M+$567K$2.4M22.9%
$16.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.7M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.6M
Organic Growth
$5.7M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$107K$160K$214K$257K
Cost to Collect$107K$160K$214K$256K
A/R Days Reduction$65K$97K$130K$156K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$283K$425K$567K$680K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.2%-11.0%-1.0%8.7%
P89
Net-to-Gross26.2%26.1%30.7%40.6%
P25
Occupancy41.0%25.7%35.9%57.7%
P59
Rev/Bed$289K$581K$852K$1.4M
P5
Exp/Bed$245K$602K$969K$1.2M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML