Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL
CCN 182002 | KY | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $247K → Pro Forma $925K (+$679K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$247K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$679K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$925K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$493K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$679K
Modeled Uplift
$489K
Risk-Adjusted
-$190K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$257K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$256K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$156K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$679K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$257K$257K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$247K$8K$256K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$117K$156K$493K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$64K$128K$193K$257K$257K$257K$257K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$128K$192K$256K$256K$256K$256K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$104K$156K$156K$156K$156K$156K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$185K$370K$550K$679K$679K$679K$679K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $679K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x91% / 25.4x95% / 28.5x100% / 31.7x102% / 33.3x103% / 34.9x
9.0x86% / 22.2x90% / 25.0x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.6x
10.0x81% / 19.6x86% / 22.2x90% / 24.7x92% / 26.0x94% / 27.2x
11.0x77% / 17.6x82% / 19.9x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.3x90% / 24.5x
12.0x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.2x
Headroom (turns)
65%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 65% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.3x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$247K$247K1.9%
Year 1$254K+$452K$706K5.5%
Year 2$262K+$679K$940K7.3%
Year 3$270K+$679K$948K7.4%
Year 4$278K+$679K$956K7.4%
Year 5$286K+$679K$965K7.5%
$2.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$10.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.1M
Value Created
$965K
Exit EBITDA
$393K
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$965K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$128K$193K$257K$308K
Denial Rate Reductio$128K$192K$256K$307K
A/R Days Reduction$78K$117K$156K$188K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$339K$509K$679K$814K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-10.7%-0.8%7.6%
P56
Net-to-Gross35.1%27.6%34.2%41.2%
P50
Occupancy77.3%29.1%36.8%52.8%
P92
Rev/Bed$559K$667K$911K$1.4M
P17
Exp/Bed$548K$735K$1.1M$1.2M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML