Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FLEMING COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FLEMING COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 181332 | KY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$799K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$697K
Risk-Adjusted
-$398K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$416K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$412K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$253K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$416K$416K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$401K$11K$412K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$64K$189K$253K$799K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$104K$208K$312K$416K$416K$416K$416K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$103K$206K$309K$412K$412K$412K$412K
A/R Days Reduction$0$84K$169K$253K$253K$253K$253K$253K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$298K$596K$888K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.9x74% / 15.7x75% / 16.6x
9.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
10.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
11.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.8x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
12.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.8x57% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M6.0%
Year 1$1.3M+$730K$2.0M9.7%
Year 2$1.3M+$1.1M$2.4M11.7%
Year 3$1.4M+$1.1M$2.5M11.9%
Year 4$1.4M+$1.1M$2.5M12.1%
Year 5$1.5M+$1.1M$2.6M12.3%
$12.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$28.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.5M
Value Created
$2.6M
Exit EBITDA
$2.0M
Organic Growth
$11.0M
RCM Value Creation
$2.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$208K$312K$416K$500K
Denial Rate Reductio$206K$309K$412K$495K
A/R Days Reduction$127K$190K$253K$304K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$548K$821K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.0%-11.0%-2.3%6.7%
P73
Net-to-Gross30.3%27.7%32.3%40.6%
P38
Occupancy34.0%25.7%35.6%51.3%
P42
Rev/Bed$833K$610K$868K$1.4M
P44
Exp/Bed$782K$662K$1.0M$1.2M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML