Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JANE TODD CRAWFORD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JANE TODD CRAWFORD HOSPITAL
CCN 181325 | KY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $7.2M → Pro Forma $9.1M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$496K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$723K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$715K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$440K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$723K$723K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$695K$20K$715K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$111K$329K$440K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$181K$361K$542K$723K$723K$723K$723K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$179K$358K$537K$715K$715K$715K$715K
A/R Days Reduction$0$147K$293K$440K$440K$440K$440K$440K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$518K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.2M$7.2M20.0%
Year 1$7.5M+$1.3M$8.7M24.2%
Year 2$7.7M+$1.9M$9.6M26.5%
Year 3$7.9M+$1.9M$9.8M27.2%
Year 4$8.2M+$1.9M$10.1M27.8%
Year 5$8.4M+$1.9M$10.3M28.5%
$72.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$113.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$40.8M
Value Created
$10.3M
Exit EBITDA
$11.5M
Organic Growth
$19.0M
RCM Value Creation
$10.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$361K$542K$723K$867K
Denial Rate Reductio$358K$537K$715K$858K
A/R Days Reduction$220K$330K$440K$528K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$17K$23K$28K
Total$950K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.0%-11.0%-2.3%6.7%
P96
Net-to-Gross100.0%27.7%32.3%40.6%
P96
Occupancy75.6%25.7%35.6%51.3%
P91
Rev/Bed$1.4M$610K$868K$1.4M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.2M$662K$1.0M$1.2M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML