Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE MEDICAL CENTER AT SCOTTSVILLE 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE MEDICAL CENTER AT SCOTTSVILLE
CCN 181324 | KY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $3.7M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$512K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$695K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$688K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$423K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$695K$695K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$669K$19K$688K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$107K$316K$423K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$174K$348K$521K$695K$695K$695K$695K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$172K$344K$516K$688K$688K$688K$688K
A/R Days Reduction$0$141K$282K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$498K$996K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x
9.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.4x
10.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x68% / 13.6x
11.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
12.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M5.3%
Year 1$1.9M+$1.2M$3.1M9.0%
Year 2$1.9M+$1.8M$3.8M10.9%
Year 3$2.0M+$1.8M$3.8M11.0%
Year 4$2.1M+$1.8M$3.9M11.2%
Year 5$2.1M+$1.8M$4.0M11.4%
$18.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$43.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.2M
Value Created
$4.0M
Exit EBITDA
$2.9M
Organic Growth
$18.3M
RCM Value Creation
$4.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$348K$521K$695K$834K
Denial Rate Reductio$344K$516K$688K$826K
A/R Days Reduction$211K$317K$423K$507K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$22K$27K
Total$914K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.3%-11.0%-2.3%6.7%
P71
Net-to-Gross40.3%27.7%32.3%40.6%
P71
Occupancy69.5%25.7%35.6%51.3%
P87
Rev/Bed$1.4M$610K$868K$1.4M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.3M$662K$1.0M$1.2M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML