Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARY BRECKINRIDGE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARY BRECKINRIDGE HOSPITAL
CCN 181316 | KY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $2.6M → Pro Forma $3.7M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$817K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$752K
Risk-Adjusted
-$368K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$426K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$422K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$259K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$426K$426K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$410K$12K$422K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$65K$194K$259K$817K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$106K$213K$319K$426K$426K$426K$426K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$105K$211K$316K$422K$422K$422K$422K
A/R Days Reduction$0$86K$173K$259K$259K$259K$259K$259K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$305K$610K$908K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
9.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.6M$2.6M12.3%
Year 1$2.7M+$747K$3.4M16.1%
Year 2$2.8M+$1.1M$3.9M18.3%
Year 3$2.9M+$1.1M$4.0M18.7%
Year 4$2.9M+$1.1M$4.1M19.1%
Year 5$3.0M+$1.1M$4.1M19.5%
$26.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$45.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.5M
Value Created
$4.1M
Exit EBITDA
$4.2M
Organic Growth
$11.2M
RCM Value Creation
$4.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$213K$319K$426K$511K
Denial Rate Reductio$211K$316K$422K$506K
A/R Days Reduction$130K$194K$259K$311K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$16K
Total$560K$840K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.3%-11.0%-2.3%6.7%
P84
Net-to-Gross27.8%27.7%32.3%40.6%
P25
Occupancy51.0%25.7%35.6%51.3%
P73
Rev/Bed$852K$610K$868K$1.4M
P47
Exp/Bed$747K$662K$1.0M$1.2M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML