Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST ELIZABETH - GRANT COUNTY 2026-04-26 19:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST ELIZABETH - GRANT COUNTY
CCN 181311 | KY | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $4.5M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$707K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$675K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$668K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$411K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$675K$675K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$649K$19K$668K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$307K$411K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$169K$337K$506K$675K$675K$675K$675K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$167K$334K$501K$668K$668K$668K$668K
A/R Days Reduction$0$137K$274K$411K$411K$411K$411K$411K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$483K$967K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x70% / 14.4x
9.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
10.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M8.1%
Year 1$2.8M+$1.2M$4.0M11.8%
Year 2$2.9M+$1.8M$4.7M13.8%
Year 3$3.0M+$1.8M$4.8M14.1%
Year 4$3.1M+$1.8M$4.8M14.4%
Year 5$3.2M+$1.8M$4.9M14.6%
$27.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$54.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.0M
Value Created
$4.9M
Exit EBITDA
$4.3M
Organic Growth
$17.7M
RCM Value Creation
$4.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$337K$506K$675K$810K
Denial Rate Reductio$334K$501K$668K$802K
A/R Days Reduction$205K$308K$411K$493K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$887K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.1%-10.6%-1.0%8.1%
P73
Net-to-Gross39.4%30.3%38.6%42.0%
P52
Occupancy8.5%25.8%36.8%53.5%
P0
Rev/Bed$2.2M$735K$957K$1.4M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.1M$817K$1.1M$1.2M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML