Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CASEY COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CASEY COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 181309 | KY | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $10.1M → Pro Forma $12.1M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$474K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$755K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$747K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$459K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$755K$755K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$726K$21K$747K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$343K$459K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$189K$377K$566K$755K$755K$755K$755K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$187K$374K$560K$747K$747K$747K$747K
A/R Days Reduction$0$153K$306K$459K$459K$459K$459K$459K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$541K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x27% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.1M$10.1M26.8%
Year 1$10.4M+$1.3M$11.8M31.1%
Year 2$10.7M+$2.0M$12.7M33.7%
Year 3$11.1M+$2.0M$13.0M34.6%
Year 4$11.4M+$2.0M$13.4M35.5%
Year 5$11.7M+$2.0M$13.7M36.4%
$101.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$151.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$49.7M
Value Created
$13.7M
Exit EBITDA
$16.1M
Organic Growth
$19.9M
RCM Value Creation
$13.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$377K$566K$755K$906K
Denial Rate Reductio$374K$560K$747K$897K
A/R Days Reduction$230K$344K$459K$551K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$993K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.8%-10.9%-1.6%7.1%
P98
Net-to-Gross100.0%27.8%32.8%41.1%
P96
Occupancy86.4%26.1%36.4%52.3%
P96
Rev/Bed$1.6M$638K$911K$1.4M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.2M$711K$1.1M$1.2M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML