Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JAMES B HAGGIN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JAMES B HAGGIN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 181302 | KY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $6.8M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$596K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$779K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$771K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$474K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$779K$779K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$750K$21K$771K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$120K$354K$474K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$195K$389K$584K$779K$779K$779K$779K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$193K$386K$578K$771K$771K$771K$771K
A/R Days Reduction$0$158K$316K$474K$474K$474K$474K$474K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$558K$1.1M$1.7M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M12.2%
Year 1$4.9M+$1.4M$6.3M16.0%
Year 2$5.0M+$2.0M$7.1M18.2%
Year 3$5.2M+$2.0M$7.2M18.6%
Year 4$5.3M+$2.0M$7.4M19.0%
Year 5$5.5M+$2.0M$7.5M19.4%
$47.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$83.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.6M
Value Created
$7.5M
Exit EBITDA
$7.6M
Organic Growth
$20.5M
RCM Value Creation
$7.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$389K$584K$779K$935K
Denial Rate Reductio$386K$578K$771K$925K
A/R Days Reduction$237K$355K$474K$569K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.2%-11.0%-2.3%6.7%
P82
Net-to-Gross38.6%27.7%32.3%40.6%
P64
Occupancy64.2%25.7%35.6%51.3%
P82
Rev/Bed$1.6M$610K$868K$1.4M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.4M$662K$1.0M$1.2M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML