Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT JOSEPH EAST 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT JOSEPH EAST
CCN 180143 | KY | 138 beds | Current EBITDA $5.4M → Pro Forma $16.5M (+$11.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$209.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$11.0M
Modeled Uplift
$7.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.2M (vs $11.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$134K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.2M$4.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.0M$115K$4.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$643K$1.9M$2.5M$8.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$134K$134K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$850K$1.7M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$67K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$6.0M$8.9M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x82% / 20.1x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.2x93% / 26.5x94% / 27.8x
9.0x77% / 17.5x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.1x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.4x
10.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.5x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.6x
11.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x
12.0x65% / 12.3x70% / 14.0x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
57%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 57% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.4M$5.4M2.6%
Year 1$5.6M+$7.3M$12.9M6.2%
Year 2$5.8M+$11.0M$16.8M8.0%
Year 3$5.9M+$11.0M$17.0M8.1%
Year 4$6.1M+$11.0M$17.1M8.2%
Year 5$6.3M+$11.0M$17.3M8.3%
$54.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$190.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$136.2M
Value Created
$17.3M
Exit EBITDA
$8.7M
Organic Growth
$110.2M
RCM Value Creation
$17.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$67K$101K$134K$161K
Total$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$13.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.6%-9.8%0.4%10.3%
P55
Net-to-Gross34.6%18.3%29.5%42.1%
P68
Occupancy42.9%45.4%53.8%65.7%
P20
Rev/Bed$1.5M$406K$1.1M$1.5M
P72
Exp/Bed$1.5M$403K$1.0M$1.5M
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML